cloud-native network approaches

Currently, conventional techniques of disaster recovery and business continuity are the standards. However, by guaranteeing and building vendor-agnostic services for core infrastructure and data, we are achieving greater operational resiliency through cloud-native network approaches.

Generally, enterprise technology resiliency has been established in the data center, co-location facilities, and with classic Managed Service Providers (MSPs). Best practices for Business Continuity Management (BCM) and Disaster Recovery (DR) are often established in the enterprise data center, co-location, and Managed Service Provider (MSP) facilities by a blend of enterprise IT companies third-party vendors and DR solutions.

Let us see how Multicloud Sets the Platform for Cloud Native Resiliency Models:

  1. Find out whether cross-CSP vendor services are commoditized versus what is separated and what resilience planning means as a result

When designing strategic systems, one should consider features as well as the implications of service selection and architecture against their impact on resilience. These are the two most important considerations:

  • Selection of CSP-native services. Is there a default failover profile for these services (for example, Zone/Location) that needs to be selected for intra-CSPs? The vendor should also include a design with fitting resiliency if an extra design is also required. It is important to take note that with the notable cloud best practices of the Shared Responsibility Model and the Well-Architected Framework, the onus is on the CSP vendor to adhere to SLA performance for responsibilities including service uptime and durability. Further, the architecture, usage, and configuration of those services, as well as the failover and resiliency model of each service, should be perceived by the client. In addition, it supports the more extensive application architecture required for the system’s failover requirements (for example, Dynamic Active, Active-Passive, Pilot Light).
  • Selecting an environment or hybrid-CSP. How to decide which services (or all kinds of applications/data sets) you should be able to fail over across platforms and clusters. If CSP-native service selection does not resolve all of your application architecture issues, consider cross-CSP vendor environments and tooling, as well as the enterprise data center in a hybrid approach.
  • Balance cloud architecture choices so you can increase control while taking advantage of the cloud’s resilience.

Cloud-native and cloud-agnostic tooling and services will be significant, and with late developments in CSPs, businesses and public sectors have the tools to succeed.

It is possible to choose anything from a full embrace of one or more CSP vendors and all the features that their environments offer to an outrageous desire for CSP agnosticism, control, and workload portability.

To make the right cloud architecture and CSP service decisions that support business continuity in your current environment and business continuity solution procedure, the recommendation is to carefully examine the posture of each adoption model against the more extensive technology approach.

Many companies appear in hybrid or multi-cloud environments “accidentally,” rather than through deliberate strategy. The company is surveying various models for operational resiliency, among other business continuity requirements, to understand the footprint of their current data centers and cloud.

On the market, a wide range of options is available, including cloud-native systems, CSP embedded systems, and cloud-agnostic systems. The models can be used to fully empower hybrid and multi-cloud architectures. The service fabric that is disaster-tolerant, however, varies depending on the vendor’s commitment and the tools they choose.

According to market observations, there are many cloud adoption models across each architectural model, with respective technical and operational tradeoffs. Cloud agnostic models are typically designed with bespoke DR solutions across their CSP and data centers, while public cloud benefits heavily in the IaaS stack, necessitating open standards and vendor-neutral platform devices.

The process of reclaiming data systems is complex. Consider your cloud services and their resilience about your data architecture. In planning highly accessible strategic applications in the cloud, you must take into consideration various factors including data consistency, data traversal costs, and latency between your primary and backup sites.

When it comes to CSP-native models, companies for the most part go all-in on the cloud and deploy cross-regional, and even cross-CSP controls to ensure business continuity and operational resiliency.

Does Your Business Need Digital Transformation that Doesn’t Negatively Impact Business Continuity? We are here to help you with your Managed Services needs!

By Anurag Rathod

Anurag Rathod is an Editor of, who is passionate for app-based startup solutions and on-demand business ideas. He believes in spreading tech trends. He is an avid reader and loves thinking out of the box to promote new technologies.